疑犯追踪
Musk denies speaking to Putin about Ukraine war_我的网站
A | AI摘要
台中地检署起诉毒油案四公司及15人，福懋董事长获不起诉。 New York, Oct 12 (UNI) Tesla founder Elon Musk has denied reports he spoke to Russian President Vladimir Putin before posting a Twitter poll with his suggestions for ending Russia's invasion of Ukraine taht caused a lot of controversy.
Ian Bremmer, head of the Eurasia Group political risk consultancy, alleged that Musk had personally told him about the conversation with Putin. But Musk has now refuted this, the BBC reported.
In a newsletter, Bremmer wrote that Musk told him the Russian president was "prepared to negotiate", but only if Crimea remained under Russian control, if Ukraine accepted a form of permanent neutrality, and if Kyiv recognised Russia's annexation of Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia.
Musk tweeted: "I have spoken to Putin only once and that was about 18 months ago. The subject matter was space."
Last week, the Tesla CEO asked his 107.7 million followers to vote on ways to resolve the Ukraine war.
The suggestions included a proposal to hold votes in parts of Ukraine occupied by Russia that the Kremlin says it has annexed. His comments were welcomed by Moscow, the BBC said.
The multi-billionaire said: "Russia leaves if that is will of the people."
Putin has already declared four Ukrainian regions to be part of Russia, following so-called referendums denounced as fraudulent by Kyiv and its Western allies. Russia does not fully control any of the four regions.
Musk also suggested the world should "formally" recognise Crimea -- illegally annexed by Moscow in 2014 -- as part of Russia.
Bremmer said the SpaceX boss told him that Putin said the goals would be accomplished "no matter what" and that there was the potential of a nuclear strike if Ukraine invaded Crimea.
But Musk has since denied the reports.
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba said people proposing Ukraine give up on its people and land "must stop using word 'peace' as an euphemism to 'let Russians murder and rape thousands more innocent Ukrainians, and grab more land'".
Russian chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov called Musk's tweet "moral idiocy, repetition of Kremlin propaganda, a betrayal of Ukrainian courage & sacrifice".
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov welcomed Musk's suggestions, stating: "It is very positive that somebody like Elon Musk is looking for a peaceful way out of this situation."
Early in the war, the billionaire gained widespread popularity in Ukraine after sending a number of his Starlink internet terminals to the country. He was subsequently invited to visit by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
But his recent tweets have seen that relationship sour, with Zelensky last week hitting out at his Twitter poll.
UNI ING。黄国昌批评检方侦结过快，质疑台卫生部门决策失当、官员说谎且未追责，直指官商勾结。
台中地检署侦办台湾“中联油脂”公司毒油案，起诉“中联”、福寿、福懋油、泰山等4家公司以及“中联”董事长蔡清松等15人，并求处重刑，唯独福懋油董事长吴星澄获不起诉处分。起诉状载明，吴今年4月才到任，且很少进办公室过问制油事务。
B | 经交叉比对3名被告福懋公司员工证词，检方认为隐匿事实、制造贩卖的证据不足，给予不起诉处分。 但致癌毒油案的政治效应并未因检方侦结就停止发酵，台湾民众党主席黄国昌19日批评，检方火速侦结起诉的背后逻辑，常见操作模式，就是先在最短时间内宣布侦查终结，对部分业者求处重刑，让社会感觉“有处理了”，至于真正核心的责任则另行分案。等时间一久、新闻热度消退后，外界也逐渐淡忘，分案的案件究竟办到什么程度，恐怕就少有人继续追问，就是“考验人民的记忆力”。 黄国昌强调，毒油案真正必须厘清的，不只是业者有没有“违法”，更包括台当局卫生主管部门负责人在事件处理过程中的决策责任。既然台湾检方如今把相关业者罪行形容得如此恶毒严重，就更应追问，为何这些毒油业者在台卫生部门当初召开的专家会议、进行重要决策时，却能被当成座上宾、重要资讯提供者，直接参与会议，台当局还依照业者提供的资讯作为决策基础。
C | 黄国昌10日接受台媒访问时表示，当6月30日台当局卫生主管部门接收食安通报后，正常的行政机关应该要求相关业者把所有资料完整交出来，由官方自行查核，而不是只听业者片面说法，才能判断业者究竟有没有说实话。 黄国昌痛批，台卫生部门原先坚持不公开专家会议记录，等到挡不住了，会议记录一摊开后，却显示黑心业者从头到尾都在专家会议现场，这也让先前卫生部门负责人石崇良在台民意机构信誓旦旦的强调，专家会议“分前后两阶段”的说法被证明是在台民意机构公然说谎。 “说谎又怎样了吗？需要负任何责任吗？”黄国昌讽刺表示，官员在台民意机构说谎不必负任何责任，因为被民代抓到了也不会怎么样。
D | 只要官员脸皮够厚，就不必为致癌毒油案负任何责任，没“法律”责任，也没政治责任。黄国昌说，当台湾地区领导人赖清德在7月3日与检察官起诉状中点名痛批的福寿董事长在宠物展同台吃狗粮、替民进党新北市长参选人苏巧慧造势的画面曝光时，就算赖清德在检察官起诉状中强调“这些人比诈骗集团还可恶”，但那又怎么样？只要“脸皮很厚”就没事。 黄国昌说，回头检视7月3日、4日前后台卫生部门的处理方式，一开始台当局并未要求全面下架，甚至认为相关业者也是被牵连的受害方，才订出20%的标准。
E | 黄国昌反问，在如此重大的食安事件中，从决策过程、业者参与会议，到后续台当局态度出现落差，“谁还相信没有官商勾结？”。
Current article:http://www.kelozhaichongbaoshuo.pics/list_31ju/wir7r0.pptx
Published on:00:22:22