哔哩哔哩

Chinese expert warns Philippines not to mistake humanitarian accommodation for concession as Philippine military twists facts on Ren’ai Jiao resupply_我的网站

A |     童心筑梦          乐迎新年          HAPPY NEW YEAR                    新年的钟声即将敲响          喜悦的心情溢于言表          祝大家身体健康！元旦快乐！                                        元旦放假通知                    根据上级通知，2025年1 月 1 日（星期三），放假一天，1 月 2 日正常上课。

B |                    一          二          三          四          五          六          日          30          31          1          2          3          4          5                                                  元旦佳节的来历                              中国有五千年悠久的历史，但是你知道中国的“元旦”到底指的是哪一天吗？          我们大家知道，在1912年之前，中国是不用公历纪年法的，我们用的是农历。    

    Screenshot from video obtained by the Global Times on July 21, 2026 shows the transfer of injured Philippine personnel near Ren'ai Jiao, which was overseen and assisted by the China Coast Guard. Photo: Courtesy of the China Coast GuardThe Philippine military side has again claimed that resupplying its grounded warship at Ren'ai Jiao needs no foreign approval and resupply there is within its self-claimed so-called EEZ, while Philippine media acknowledged that 15 "safe" resupply missions were made over the past two years under a China-Philippines provisional arrangement. 
Chinese experts warned on Wednesday that Manila should not mistake humanitarian accommodation for a concession and must bear the consequences if it scraps the arrangement.
Yang Xiao, a research fellow at the Institute of Peaceful Development under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Wednesday that the Philippine side's claims are fundamentally flawed from legal, historical and practical perspectives. 
Ren'ai Jiao is an inherent part of China's Nansha Qundao, over which China has indisputable and complete sovereignty, Yang said, adding that it is legally untenable for the Philippines to claim that Ren'ai Jiao is part of its exclusive economic zone.
"The Philippines deliberately grounded the abandoned warship at Ren'ai Jiao in 1999 and repeatedly pledged to remove it and restore the reef, but has failed to honor those commitments for more than two decades. This itself constitutes a continuing violation of China's territorial sovereignty," Yang said. 
This is not the first time the Philippines has denied seeking China's approval for resupply missions to Ren'ai Jiao. In April 2025, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun responded to similar claims, saying that China's position on how to handle the current situation at Ren'ai Jiao is clear and consistent.
"First, by keeping its warship grounded at Ren'ai Jiao for decades running, the Philippines has been violating China's sovereignty and the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC). We demand that the Philippines tow away the warship. Second, between now and when the warship is towed away, should the Philippines need to send living necessities, China is willing to allow it in a humanitarian spirit if the Philippines informs China in advance and after on-site verification is conducted. Third, if the Philippines were to send large amount of construction materials to the warship and attempt to build fixed facilities or permanent outpost, China will absolutely not accept it and will resolutely stop it in accordance with the law and regulations," said the spokesperson.
"This means that the Philippines' so-called '15 safe and incident-free resupply missions' were all made possible by China's humanitarian accommodation and strict oversight," Yang stressed. Each mission was reported in advance and allowed to proceed only after inspections confirmed no prohibited construction materials were aboard. The CCG intercepted any such materials through lawful measures, Yang said.
The Philippines' unilateral denial of its notification and inspection obligations while enjoying the arrangement's benefits amounts to a blatant breach of its commitments, the expert noted.
Yang also noted that Manila's narrative contains an obvious logical contradiction. If Philippine resupply missions were truly unimpeded, there would be no need for Manila to repeatedly claim that China had "blocked" its missions and call for international intervention. Yet if China had continuously "obstructed" the missions, the Philippines could not have completed 15 safe and incident-free resupply operations. 
"Manila has simply manipulated its narrative to suit its publicity needs, portraying itself as a 'victim' when seeking international attention while touting smooth resupply operations and its own strength when seeking to project toughness. Its hype over the 15 resupply missions is essentially aimed at rallying domestic support and stoking confrontation internationally to conceal the reality that its illegal presence is tightly constrained," Yang said.
China's handling of the Ren'ai Jiao situation, meanwhile, has consistently reflected restraint and humanitarian considerations. According to a statement by the China Coast Guard (CCG) spokesperson on the transfer of injured personnel by the Philippine side, Jiang Lue, a CCG spokesperson, said that on the morning of July 21, out of humanitarian considerations, China allowed the Philippines to transfer injured personnel by small boats from the BRP Sierra Madre (LT-57), which has been illegally grounded at Ren'ai Jiao, to Philippine Coast Guard vessel 9702. The CCG questioned and verified the Philippine vessels and monitored the entire process.
The CCG will continue to carry out rights-protection and law enforcement operations in accordance with the law in the waters around Ren'ai Jiao to safeguard China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests, Jiang said.
Yang said, stressing that Manila's tough talk and one-sided claims cannot make up for its legal and moral shortcomings.
"Any attempt to permanently occupy Chinese islands and reefs, unilaterally tear up the understanding and continuously challenge China's territorial sovereignty runs counter to international law and the broader trend toward peace and development in the region and is ultimately doomed to fail," Yang added.
。传统节日中的元旦，就是农历的正月初一，也就是现在的春节。

C | 元旦，据说起于三皇五帝之一的颛顼，距今已有5000多年的历史。         中国元旦历来指的是夏历正月初一。正月初一的计算方法，在汉武帝时期以前也是很不统一的。因此，历代的元旦月、日也并不一致。夏朝的夏历以孟喜月为正月，商朝的殷历以腊月（十二月）为正月，周朝的周历以冬月（十一月）为正月。秦始皇统一中国后，又以阳春月（十月）为正月，即十月初一为元旦。         从汉武帝起，规定孟喜月（元月）为正月，把孟喜月的第一天称为元旦，一直沿用到清朝末年。         1912年1月13日，孙中山发布《临时大总统关于颁布历书令》，责成内务部编印新历书。随后又规定公历1月1日为“新年”，但不叫“元旦”。         1914年1月，民国政府的内务部在致袁世凯的呈文中提出：“拟请定阴历元旦为春节，端午为夏节，中秋为秋节，冬至为冬节。凡我国民均得休息，在公人员亦准给假一日。”袁世凯考虑到其他少数民族的习惯问题，只批准“元旦为春节”。由此，传统农历新年岁首被官方正式易名为“春节”，传统的“元旦”“新年”名称被安置在公历的1月1日这一天。

D |          1949年9月27日，中国人民政治协商会议第一届全体会议决议：“中华人民共和国纪年采用公元纪年法”，即是我们所说的阳历，为了区别农历和阳历两个新年，又鉴于农历二十四节气中的“立春”恰在农历新年的前后，因此便把农历正月初一改称为“春节”，阳历一月一日定为“元旦”，至此，元旦成为全国人民的欢乐节日。                   HAPPY NEW YEAR                    新年快乐 共迎美好                    学校领导到各班分发礼物和糖果，送去了学校对孩子们的关怀与祝福。礼物和糖果寓意着新的一年里孩子们生活甜甜蜜蜜，快乐成长。

E | 孩子们的脸上洋溢着幸福的笑容，整个校园也充满了欢声笑语。

F |          2025                    各班精心准备，呈现了丰富多彩的节目。从舞蹈、歌曲到朗诵、小品，每个节目都充满创意与童真，展现了同学们的才艺与团队合作精神。

G | 活动不仅为同学们提供了展示自我的舞台，还增强了班级凝聚力。

H | 同学们带着祝福与喜悦共同迎接充满希望的2025年。                                                           2025                    HAPPY NEW YEAR                    祝福满满 快乐成长                    在学生们欢庆元旦的同时，他们也铭记着学校师傅们的辛勤付出。因此，学生们特意为师傅们准备了精美的礼物，以表达对他们的感激之情。这些礼物都蕴含着学生们对师傅们的敬意与祝福。

I | 当师傅们收到这些礼物时，脸上都露出了欣慰的笑容，感受到了来自学生们的温暖与关怀。         回首过去的一年，我们经历了许多挑战和困难，但也收获了无数的成长和感动。在新的一年里，愿我们都能拥有更多的勇气和力量，去追求自己的梦想，去创造更美好的生活!          HAPPY NEW YEAR                     撰稿：王磊           编辑：钟少莲           审核：王志红。

Current article:http://www.kelozhaichongbaoshuo.pics/list_006/88nls.docx

Published on:16:26:59